(CornyGuy)
That's interesting stuff. Kind of like a three in one deal with that Lavender+Sunglow Motley breeding.
Not really, because all the offspring will look normal and you'd have to wait a long time to breed them to each other or to other carriers and hope you get homozygous offspring out of the second breeding. Breeding het to het (carrier to carrier) results in very few homozygous offspring of multiple traits. That's why hets for crazy morphs sell for pretty cheap...because it's difficult to recreate. Two hets for a triple recessive trait will produce a crazy mish mosh of results, but very few, if any, actual offspring will show all three traits.
For example, if you were to breed two carriers of all three traits together, the offspring could be this, statistically:
27/64 would be Normal, 66% poss.het. Lavender, 66% poss.het. Motley, 66% poss.het. Amelanistic
9/64 would be Lavender, 66% poss.het. Motley, 66% poss.het. Amelanistic
9/64 would be Amelanistic, 66% poss.het. Lavender, 66% poss.het. Motley
9/64 would be Motley, 66% poss.het. Lavender, 66% poss.het. Amelanistic
3/64 would be Lavender Amelanistic, 66% poss.het. Motley
3/64 would be Lavender Motley, 66% poss.het. Amelanistic
3/64 would be Motley Amelanistic, 66% poss.het. Lavender
1/64 would be Lavender Motley Amelanistic (Opal)
So you see, statistically, only 1 out of 64 offspring would actually show all three genes. 9 out of 64 would show two and be a
possible carrier of the third, 27 out of 64 would show one and be a
possible carrier of the other two, and 27 out of 64 would be normal and be
possible carriers of the other three. Statistically, it's a mess!